Thursday, July 22, 2010

I did 25 things today

1. Ran


2. Cleaned the lens of my iPhone camera


3. Put my laundry in the wash machine


4. Booked tickets


5. Helped Chloe tidy my room


6. Ate the breakfast I made in our new microwave oven


7. Showered


8. Took Chloe to the vet for a flea bath


9. RSVPed to CalArts pre-reunion reunion dinner


10. Made box for my trunk to put things in that I need to take to people


11. Put all my cards and stuff back in my wallet


12. Bought stamps, mailed letters


13. Checked out used cameras & phones


14. Bought a New Testament to fit in my bag


15. Bought a money clip


16. Took photos


17. Fixed up an organizer for stuff on my desk


18. Organized bathroom shelves


19. Got new barbecue-lighting matches


20. Washed dishes


21. Figured out why the dish washer wasn't working


22. Booked a fancy camera lens for the weekend


23. Picked instrumental tracks for slideshows


24. Hammocked


25. Made this

richard's list, rudi's response


Life is hard
You are going to die
You are not in control
You are not that important
Your life is not about you

Life is good
Death doesn't have the last word
It's not about control
You matter
Your life is about something


The first list was given by Richard Rohr at a men's retreat at the Ghost Ranch: I believe it is the basis of his book Adam's Return. The second list was created by Rudi Krause in response to the first.

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

andy goldsworthy | rootless


I don't think the earth needs me at all. But I do need it.

To just go off into the woods and make a piece of work roots me again. And if I don't work for a period of time I feel rootless. I don't know myself. And it's very odd, if I've not worked for say two, three weeks, and then I give a lecture talking about my work, it feels like I'm talking about somebody else.

I do need to be on my own at times. I enjoy being by myself. There are people's company I do enjoy. There probably is a social nature too, and I feed from that to some extent. But to be honest, I think I am drained by people.


Rivers & Tides: Andy Goldsworthy Working With Time (Chapter 9)

Friday, June 25, 2010

The CalArts Story (1964)

The CalArts Story
originally presented at the 1964 gala premiere of Mary Poppins
(which is, coincidentally, the first movie I ever saw in a theatre)

"No nation, and no community, can flourish, or possibly even survive, unless it provides full opportunities for the encouragement, the development, and the full utilization of the intellectual and the artistic talents of its people."
Lee A. DuBridge

Monday, June 14, 2010

Tombstone


Sacred
To the Memory
of
Adam Allyn Comedian
Who
Departed this Life
February 15 1768

This Stone Was Erected
By the American Company
As a
Testimony
of their
Unfeignd Regard

He Posesed
Many good Qualitys
But as he was a man
He
Had the Frailties
Common to man's Nature


St. Paul's Churchyard, Wall Street, NYC

Here is a news article about the headstone,
found in the Lewiston Evening Journal, November 11, 1899,
followed by a life insurance advertisement running alongside the news item.



Monday, May 24, 2010

Adam Gopnik, "What Did Jesus Do?"


Even if we allow for Mark's cryptic tracery, the human traits of his Jesus are evident: intelligence, short temper, and an ironic, duelling wit. What seems new about Jesus is not his piety or divine detachment but the humanity of his irritability and impatience. He’s no Buddha. He gets annoyed at the stupidity of his followers, their inability to grasp an obvious point. “Do you have eyes but fail to see?” he asks the hapless disciples. The fine English actor Alec McCowen used to do a one-man show in which he recited Mark, complete, and his Jesus came alive instantly as a familiar human type — the Gandhi-Malcolm-Martin kind of charismatic leader of an oppressed people, with a character that clicks into focus as you begin to dramatize it. He’s verbally spry and even a little shifty. He likes defiant, enigmatic paradoxes and pregnant parables that never quite close, perhaps by design. A story about a vineyard whose ungrateful husbandmen keep killing the servants sent to them is an anti-establishment, even an anti-clerical story, but it isn’t so obvious as to get him in trouble. The suspicious priests keep trying to catch him out in a declaration of anti-Roman sentiment: Is it lawful to give tribute to Caesar or not, they ask — that is, do you recognize Roman authority or don’t you? He has a penny brought out, sees the picture of the emperor on it, and, shrugging, says to give to the state everything that rightly belongs to the state. The brilliance of that famous crack is that Jesus turns the question back on the questioner, in mock-innocence. Why, you give the king the king’s things and God God’s. Of course, this leaves open the real question: what is Caesar’s and what is God’s? It’s a tautology designed to evade self-incrimination.

Jesus’ morality has a brash, sidewise indifference to conventional ideas of goodness. His pet style blends the epigrammatic with the enigmatic. When he makes that complaint about the prophet having no honor in his own home town, or says exasperatedly that there is no point in lighting a candle unless you intend to put it in a candlestick, his voice carries a disdain for the props of piety that still feels startling. And so with the tale of the boy who wastes his inheritance but gets a feast from his father, while his dutiful brother doesn’t; or the one about the weeping whore who is worthier than her good, prim onlookers; or about the passionate Mary who is better than her hardworking sister Martha. There is a wild gaiety about Jesus’ moral teachings that still leaps off the page. He is informal in a new way, too, that remains unusual among prophets. He continually addresses God as “Abba,” Father, or even Dad, and the expression translated in the King James Version as a solemn “Verily I say unto you” is actually a quirky Aramaic throat-clearer, like Dr. Johnson’s “Depend upon it, Sir.”

Some of the sayings do have, in their contempt for material prosperity, the ring of Greek Cynic philosophy, but there is also something neither quite Greek nor quite Jewish about Jesus’ morality that makes it fresh and strange even now. Is there a more miraculous scene in ancient literature than the one in John where Jesus absent-mindedly writes on the ground while his fellow-Jews try to entrap him into approving the stoning of an adulteress, only to ask, wide-eyed, if it wouldn’t be a good idea for the honor of throwing the first stone to be given to the man in the mob who hasn’t sinned himself? Too much fussing about place and home and ritual, and even about where, exactly, you’re going to live, is unnecessary: be wanderers, dharma bums.

This social radicalism still shines through — not a programmatic radicalism of national revolution but one of Kerouac-like satori-seeking-on-the-road. And the social radicalism is highly social. The sharpest opposition in the Gospels is between John the Faster and Jesus the Feaster. Jesus eats and drinks with whores and highwaymen, turns water into wine, and, finally, in one way or another, establishes a mystical union at a feast through its humble instruments of bread and wine.

The table is his altar in every sense. Jesus’ fressing was perhaps the most radical element in his life — his table manners pointed the way to his heavenly morals. Within a Mediterranean Jewish peasant culture, a culture of clan and cohort, who eats with whom defines who stands where and why. So the way Jesus repeatedly violates the rules on eating, on “commensality,” would have shocked his contemporaries. He dines with people of a different social rank, which would have shocked most Romans, and with people of different tribal allegiance, which would have shocked most Jews. The most forceful of his sayings, still shocking to any pious Jew or Muslim, is “What goes into a man’s mouth does not make him unclean, but what comes out of his mouth, that is what makes him unclean.” Jesus isn’t a hedonist or an epicurean, but he clearly isn’t an ascetic, either: he feeds the multitudes rather than instructing them how to go without. He’s interested in saving people living normal lives, buying and selling what they can, rather than in retreating into the company of those who have already arrived at a moral conclusion about themselves.


edited from "What Did Jesus Do? Reading and unreading the Gospels"
by Adam Gopnik
New Yorker, May 24, 2010

Saturday, May 15, 2010

photos | bike

Rocky Balboa, "It ain't how hard you hit"


"The world ain't all sunshine and rainbows. It is a very mean and nasty place and it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently if you let it. You, me, or nobody is gonna hit as hard as life. But it ain't how hard you hit; it's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. How much you can take, and keep moving forward."

Rocky Balboa

Monday, April 26, 2010

Luci Shaw, "Gossip"


It was as much about feeling duped
as being supplanted.

No cell phones or TV, but
the grapevine worked swiftly enough.

In his castle in Jerusalem,
Herod vented his frustration, cranky as

a squirrel ranting, head down
on the cedar trunk, tail quivering with rage

at territorial invasion. King? King?
What king? Not in my backyard!

While God was parking his throne
elsewhere.


from Harvesting Fog

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Edward Abbey, "Desert TV"


"Listen lady, if I saw a TV out here I'd get out my cannon and shoot it like I would a mad dog, right in the eye. . . . What's the principle of the TV, madam? The vacuum tube, madam. And do you know what happens if you stick your head in a vacuum tube? I'll tell you: you get your brains sucked out."

Edward Abbey, "Desert Solitaire"

Anne Carson, "TV Men: Lazarus"


DIRECTOR OF PHOTOGRAPHY: VOICEOVER

Yes I admit to a degree of unease about my
motives in making
this documentary.
Mere prurience of a kind that is all too common nowadays
in public catastrophes. I was listening

to a peace negotiator for the Balkans talk
about his vocation
on the radio the other day.
“We drove down through this wasteland and I didn’t know
much about the area but I was

fascinated by the horrors of it. I had never
seen a thing like this.
I videotaped it.
Then sent a 13-page memo to the UN with my suggestions.”
This person was a member

of the International Rescue Committee,
not a man of TV.
But you can see
how the pull is irresistible. The pull to handle horrors
and to have a theory of them.

But now I see my assistant producer waving her arms
at me to get
on with the script.
The name Lazarus is an abbreviated form of the Hebrew ‘El’azar,
meaning “God has helped.”

I have long been interested in those whom God has helped.
It seems to often be the case,
e.g. with saints or martyrs,
that God helps them to far more suffering than they would have
without God’s help. But then you get

someone like Lazarus, a man of no
particular importance,
on whom God bestows
the ultimate benevolence, without explanation, then abandons
him again to his nonentity.

We are left wondering, Why Lazarus?
My theory is
God wants us to wonder this.
After all, if there were some quality that Lazarus possessed,
some criterion of excellence

by which he was chosen to be called
back
from death,
then we would all start attempting to achieve this.
But if

God’s gift is simply random, well
for one thing
it makes a
more interesting TV show. God’s choice can be seen emerging
from the dark side of reason

like a new planet. No use being historical
about this planet,
it is just an imitation.
As Lazarus is an imitation of Christ. As TV is an imitation of
Lazarus. As you and I are an imitation of

TV. Already you notice that
although I am merely
a director of photography,
I have grasped certain fundamental notions first advanced by Plato,
e.g. that our reality is just a TV set

inside a TV set inside a TV set, with nobody watching
but Sokrates,
who changed the channel in 399 B.C. But my bond with Lazarus goes deeper, indeed
nausea overtakes me when faced with

the prospect of something simply beginning all over again.
Each time I have to
raise my slate and say
“Take 12!” or “Take 13!” and then “Take 14!”
I cannot restrain a shudder.

Repetition is horrible. Poor Lazarus cannot have known
he was an
imitation Christ,
but who can doubt he realized, soon after being ripped out of his
warm little bed in the ground,

his own epoch of repetition just beginning.
Lazarus Take 2!
Poor drop.
As a bit of salt falls back down the funnel. Or maybe my pity
is misplaced. Some people think Lazarus lucky,

like Samuel Beckett who calls him “Happy Larry” or Rilke
who speaks of
that moment in a game
when “the pure too-little flips over into the empty too-much.”
Well I am not explaining why my documentary

focuses entirely on this moment, the flip-over moment.
Before and after
don’t interest me.
You won’t be seeing any clips from home videos of Lazarus
in short pants racing his sisters up a hill.

No footage of Mary and Martha side by side on the sofa
discussing how they manage
at home
with a dead one sitting down to dinner. No panel of experts
debating who was really the victim here.

Our sequence begins and ends with that moment of complete
innocence
and sport -
when Lazarus licks the first drop of afterlife off the nipple
of his own old death.

I put tiny microphones all over the ground
to pick up
the magic
of the vermin in his ten fingers and I stand back to wait
for the miracle.


posted at the pō’ĭ-trē blog,
part of a series of poems (more or less) about the movies. Carson is a Canadian, and apparently shares my aversion to television.